Prediction of Alec Deckers [900th] vs Philip Hjorth [813th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L L W W W L
Form
W L L W W L W L L LHead To Head: Deckers 1 - 0 Hjorth
They have played 2 sets in total, with Deckers winning 2 and Hjorth winning 0. The last match between Deckers and Hjorth was at the M15 Alkmaar, 27-06-2024, Second, Clay with Alec Deckers getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Alec Deckers | 1 |
| Philip Hjorth | 0 |
| Deckers | Stats | Hjorth |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (7-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 900 | Ranking | 813 |
| 483 | Highest Rank | 813 |
| 24 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 61% (115-74) | Career Total W/L | 53% (63-57) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Alec Deckers
Player
Philip Hjorth
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:35:0 | Average Match Time | 1:35:0 |
| 56% (29/52) | 1st Serve % | 72% (49/68) |
| 79% (23/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (33/49) |
| 70% (16/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (7/19) |
| 23% (3/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
| 41% (28/68) | Return Points Win % | 25% (13/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Alec Deckers vs Philip Hjorth Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Deckers 1 - 0 Hjorth
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Deckers has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Hjorth has won 40.56%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Deckers, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hjorth has won 44.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 26.15% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Deckers has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hjorth has saved 51.55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Deckers has won 59.09% of matches played (W/L 13/ 9), with Hjorth winning 52.46% (W/L 32/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Deckers has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 12/ 4), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Hjorth has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 41/ 29), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Deckers has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.9% of matches (W/L 13/ 8), where as Hjorth has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.33% of matches (W/L 32/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Deckers winning 1 times and Hjorth being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Deckers winning 2 and Hjorth winning 0. The last match between Deckers and Hjorth was at the M15 Alkmaar, 27-06-2024, Second, Clay with Alec Deckers getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:35:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Deckers and Hjorth have played a deciding set 0 times, with Deckers winning 0 times and Hjorth 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Deckers winning 0, and Hjorth 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Deckers has played against opponents with an average rank of 102.36 while Hjorth has played against players with an average rank of 86.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Deckers has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hjorth has won 27% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Deckers has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hjorth has converted 32.61% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Alec Deckers vs Philip Hjorth Best Odds For The Match
Alec Deckers Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Alec Deckers
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alec Deckers
Player
Luke Simkiss
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
16
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
7 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
16 of
54)
56
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alec Deckers
Player
Harry Wendelken
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
54 of
100)
19
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
16 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alec Deckers
Player
Kyle Edmund
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
36%
(
17 of
47)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murkel Dellien
Player
Alec Deckers
71%
(
86 of
121)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
20
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
44 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
26 of
89)
103
Total Points Won
107
|
4-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Alec Deckers
63%
(
68 of
108)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
109)
2
Aces
15
7
Double Faults
3
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
113
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alec Deckers
Player
Sidane Pontjodikromo
52%
(
46 of
88)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
11
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Alec Deckers
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alec Deckers
Player
Mikail Alimli
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alec Deckers
Player
Emilien Demanet
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Philip Hjorth Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Yusuke Kusuhara
Player
Philip Hjorth
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
4
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kuan-Yi Lee
Player
Philip Hjorth
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Yuta Tomida
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Curras Abasolo
Player
Philip Hjorth
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
71
|
1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Andres Fernandez Canovas
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Philip Hjorth
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Philip Hjorth
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Mariano Dedura-Palomero
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Deckers vs Hjorth?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Deckers Vs Hjorth is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (115/74) | Win/Loss | 53% (63/57) |
| 61% (265/173) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (148/121) |
| 53% (2309/2042) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (1290/1136) |
| 0.58 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1239 | Aces Total | 126 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 442 | Total Double Faults | 228 |
| 1:24:51 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 223.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 75.95 |
| 60% (6028/9967) | 1st Serve % | 65% (3007/4613) |
| 74% (4469/6028) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (1983/3007) |
| 51% (1990/3939) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (768/1606) |
| 38% (356/948) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (199/454) |
| 38% (3900/10387) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1845/4605) |
| 61% (115/187) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (63/117) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (45/72) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (10/15) |
| 44% (27/62) | Deciding Set Win % | 31% (10/32) |
| 85% (119/101) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 77% (75/58) |
| 15% (119/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 23% (75/17) |
| 20% (70/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (45/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
